We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
Customize Consent Preferences
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
In the ongoing discourse surrounding database technologies, a notable debate has emerged between Postgres and MongoDB, reflecting the broader SQL versus NoSQL conversation. This discussion was recently ignited by a post from Peter Zaitsev, founder of Percona, who highlighted the rising popularity of Postgres alongside a slight decline in MongoDB’s usage. The accompanying graph showcased a clear trend, prompting a flurry of commentary from industry professionals.
Among the insights shared, one user remarked, “MongoDB’s strategy prioritizes the developer experience, claiming to accelerate time-to-market (TTM) by 10x. Developers love it, but in practice, results often disappoint.” Another contributor noted the initial appeal of a schema-less, SQL-less environment, cautioning that it can lead to significant technical debt over time. A third voice in the conversation emphasized the distinct purposes of MongoDB and Postgres, asserting that comparing the two is somewhat misguided. Yet, there were also acknowledgments of MongoDB’s achievements, with one user stating, “I also think MongoDB deserves more credit for eventually delivering on what they marketed — a robust, scale-out cluster for OLTP.”
SQL’s tombstone
The SQL versus NoSQL debate took an intriguing turn when Lekhana Reddy, founder of Storytelling by Data, provocatively declared “SQL IS DEAD!!” in a LinkedIn post that featured a tombstone illustration. This bold statement was sparked by Uber’s unveiling of a natural language query tool, which Reddy suggested could render traditional SQL programming obsolete. However, she later clarified that SQL is not dead but rather evolving, a sentiment echoed by many in the comments section of her post. One user quipped, “my take: SQL WILL not die before us!”, while another added, “AI-assisted SQL won’t replace data professionals, it will enhance their capabilities.”
A relationship in the cloud
In a more positive light, the tech community celebrated a new partnership between SAP and Databricks, announced by SAP CEO Christian Klein. The launch of the SAP Business Data Cloud was met with enthusiasm, as reflected in a simple yet heartfelt response from an observer: “”.
Quote of the day
As we navigate these discussions, it’s worth reflecting on the words of a literary figure: “Love loves to love love.” Can you guess who penned this thought? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.
Database Hearts and Arrows
In the ongoing discourse surrounding database technologies, a notable debate has emerged between Postgres and MongoDB, reflecting the broader SQL versus NoSQL conversation. This discussion was recently ignited by a post from Peter Zaitsev, founder of Percona, who highlighted the rising popularity of Postgres alongside a slight decline in MongoDB’s usage. The accompanying graph showcased a clear trend, prompting a flurry of commentary from industry professionals.
Among the insights shared, one user remarked, “MongoDB’s strategy prioritizes the developer experience, claiming to accelerate time-to-market (TTM) by 10x. Developers love it, but in practice, results often disappoint.” Another contributor noted the initial appeal of a schema-less, SQL-less environment, cautioning that it can lead to significant technical debt over time. A third voice in the conversation emphasized the distinct purposes of MongoDB and Postgres, asserting that comparing the two is somewhat misguided. Yet, there were also acknowledgments of MongoDB’s achievements, with one user stating, “I also think MongoDB deserves more credit for eventually delivering on what they marketed — a robust, scale-out cluster for OLTP.”
SQL’s tombstone
The SQL versus NoSQL debate took an intriguing turn when Lekhana Reddy, founder of Storytelling by Data, provocatively declared “SQL IS DEAD!!” in a LinkedIn post that featured a tombstone illustration. This bold statement was sparked by Uber’s unveiling of a natural language query tool, which Reddy suggested could render traditional SQL programming obsolete. However, she later clarified that SQL is not dead but rather evolving, a sentiment echoed by many in the comments section of her post. One user quipped, “my take: SQL WILL not die before us!”, while another added, “AI-assisted SQL won’t replace data professionals, it will enhance their capabilities.”
A relationship in the cloud
In a more positive light, the tech community celebrated a new partnership between SAP and Databricks, announced by SAP CEO Christian Klein. The launch of the SAP Business Data Cloud was met with enthusiasm, as reflected in a simple yet heartfelt response from an observer: “
”.
Quote of the day
As we navigate these discussions, it’s worth reflecting on the words of a literary figure: “Love loves to love love.” Can you guess who penned this thought? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.