EDR

Tech Optimizer
June 11, 2026
Antivirus software can become overwhelming for organizations due to alert fatigue shortly after deployment. Analysts often struggle to prioritize notifications, leading to the mismanagement of legitimate tools and unclear incident timelines. A review of nine antivirus solutions based on G2's Winter 2026 Grid® Report identified the following top performers: 1. ESET PROTECT: Best for machine learning-driven endpoint protection; offers enterprise-grade security with a free trial available. 2. Sophos Endpoint: Best for ransomware prevention; provides centralized policy control with a free trial available. 3. ThreatDown: Cost-effective EDR with MDR flexibility; combines antivirus and endpoint detection with a free trial available. 4. CrowdStrike Falcon: Best for large-scale enterprise threat prevention; cloud-native platform with subscription-based pricing and a free trial available. 5. Check Point Harmony Endpoint: Best for unified endpoint and zero-trust protection; integrates malware prevention and phishing defense with a free trial available. 6. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Best for Microsoft-native environments; deeply integrated with Microsoft 365, licensed through enterprise agreements. 7. Kaspersky AntiVirus: Best for traditional malware protection; provides real-time protection against various threats. 8. SentinelOne: Best for autonomous AI-driven endpoint response; features automated remediation and ransomware rollback with a free trial available. 9. FortiClient: Best for Fortinet-centric environments; offers VPN access and security policy enforcement with a free basic client available. The analysis highlighted that effective antivirus solutions prioritize behavioral analysis over traditional signature-based detection, minimize false positives, and maintain low system impact during operation. Key factors for evaluating antivirus software include threat detection accuracy, centralized visibility, response capabilities, and deployment stability.
Winsage
June 8, 2026
Microsoft has rolled out new Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs, aligning with its commitment to security updates. Updates for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) will no longer be included with monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays; they will now be delivered via Microsoft Update. This change aims to allow faster deployment of EDR enhancements independently of the operating system's update cycle. The rollout for Windows 10 began in late May 2026, with plans to extend support to Windows 11 and other versions by fall 2026. EDR updates will be delivered using KB5005292, contingent on prerequisite updates. Systems must run Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have specific Windows updates installed to qualify for the new delivery method. Organizations should align their update policies with this new approach before the broader rollout. In case of significant issues, the EDR update can be reverted using a specific command. Further details are available in the Microsoft 365 Admin Center under message ID MC1381119.
Tech Optimizer
June 3, 2026
Endpoints are critical computing devices connected to networks, including personal computers, tablets, smartphones, and smart appliances, and are often targeted in cyberattacks. Robust endpoint security is essential, especially in business environments with sensitive data. Endpoint protection solutions include antivirus software, endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems, and multi-factor authentication. - 81% of businesses have faced malware-related attacks. - 59% of ransomware incidents compromise data stored in public cloud environments. - In 2023, the average cost associated with breach detection and escalation reached USD 1.58 million. - 97% of executives access work accounts via personal devices. - During Q3 2024, malware detections at endpoints surged by 300%. - 13% of employees reported being victims of phishing attacks while working remotely. - 70% of employees using ChatGPT in the workplace do so without informing their employers. - 68% of companies have reported at least one successful endpoint attack that compromised their data or IT infrastructure. - 55% of professionals consider smartphones among the most vulnerable endpoints. - 47% of organizations monitor their networks around the clock. - The global financial impact of cybercrime is projected to exceed .5 trillion annually by 2025. - In 2021, 53% of organizations experienced successful ransomware attacks, marking a 148% increase from 2020. - Paying a ransom can double the total cost of a ransomware incident. - 40% of organizations delay patch rollouts to avoid potential conflicts. - 67% of IT professionals believe that Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies have weakened their organization's security posture. - 69% of Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) expected at least one ransomware attack in 2022. - Only 50% of organizations encrypt sensitive data on their devices. - Organizations with a high number of remote workers face the greatest risks regarding endpoint security threats. - The endpoint security market is anticipated to grow from USD 13.37 billion in 2023 to USD 31.2 billion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.1%. - Approximately 70% of companies plan to increase their investment in endpoint security solutions over the next two years. - The average financial impact of a data breach is estimated at around USD 4.88 million. - In 2023, the highest costs related to breaches were linked to detection and escalation, averaging USD 1.58 million. - As of 2024, the United States has the highest average cost of data breaches globally at USD 9.36 million. - A significant breach affecting 50 to 60 million records in 2024 is expected to cost USD 375 million. - Organizations facing compliance challenges typically incur an average breach cost of USD 5.05 million. - 40% of organizations admit to postponing patch implementations to avoid potential conflicts. - 92% of remote employees report using personal smartphones or tablets for work tasks. - 80% of executives are inclined to send work-related messages from personal devices. - 80-90% of successful ransomware attacks originate from unmanaged devices. - 62% of cybersecurity experts cite data loss and leaks as their primary concerns regarding BYOD policies. - 36% of employees using personal devices for work admit to delaying security updates. - 71% of employees store sensitive work passwords on personal phones. - 67% of organizations work with multiple vendors for management and security across various device types. - Only 42% of surveyed companies have a solution to proactively identify sensitive data on employee devices. - 38% of employees state that their employer lacks BYOD policies, or that existing policies are often disregarded. - There was a 300% increase in malware detections at endpoints during Q3 2024. - In 2024, a data breach involving Twilio compromised 33 million phone numbers linked to Authy accounts. - 90% of successful cyberattacks and up to 70% of data breaches originate from endpoint devices. - 54% of security experts reported that over 20% of their total endpoints were unmanaged. - 67% of Managed Service Providers (MSPs) faced AI-driven threats in the past year. - Among HR professionals who offboarded employees in the last year, 71% reported that at least one employee failed to return company-owned devices. - 65% of employees indicated they often bypass organizational security protocols to enhance productivity. - Over 90% of security incidents related to lost or stolen devices lead to unauthorized data breaches. - 13% of employees admit to being victims of phishing attacks while working remotely. - 63% of companies may have former employees retaining access to organizational data. - 62% of employees acknowledged transferring company intellectual property to personal devices. - 59% of stolen company-owned devices contained sensitive information. - Gartner estimates that shadow IT accounts for 30-40% of IT expenditures in large organizations. - 80% of employees engage in shadow IT activities. - 76% of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) believe shadow IT poses a security risk. - 58% of SMBs have encountered significant shadow IT initiatives without the knowledge of their official IT departments. - 30% of IT leaders cite information security as the primary challenge to adopting BYOD policies. - The prevalence of shadow IT has surged by 59% due to remote work. - 70% of employees using ChatGPT in the workplace do so without employer knowledge. - 32% of remote and hybrid employees use applications or software not sanctioned by IT. - 59% of organizations have experienced data loss due to cloud-based shadow IT. - ChatGPT is the most frequently used unauthorized application among employees. - By 2027, it is projected that 75% of employees will acquire, modify, or create technology beyond IT's visibility. - The trend of paying ransoms has increased; over 47.8% of companies chose to pay in Q3, rising to 59.6% in Q4. - Tanium raised USD 300 million in Series G funding, resulting in a valuation of USD 9 billion. - Cybereason secured USD 275 million in Series F funding. - SentinelOne acquired Attivo Networks in a transaction valued at USD 616 million.
Winsage
May 30, 2026
Disabling Windows Defender is common among users setting up virtual machines or optimizing build processes, but it can be frustrating due to Windows 11's resistance to such actions. Many guides suggest using outdated registry keys, which are often reverted by updates, leading to repeated attempts to disable the protections. Users may disable Defender for several reasons, including performance issues with virtual machines, conflicts with Android emulators, hindrances in development environments, troubleshooting disk performance, and security testing in isolated labs. However, disabling antivirus software increases exposure to threats. Microsoft Defender includes components such as Antivirus, Real-Time Protection, Cloud-Delivered Protection, Tamper Protection, and Defender for Endpoint. Tamper Protection is a significant barrier to disabling Defender, as it prevents unauthorized changes to security settings. Key considerations before disabling Defender include the need for administrator rights, the effect of Tamper Protection, potential resets from Windows Updates, temporary toggles for Real-Time Protection, and the option to install third-party antivirus software, which places Defender in passive mode. Methods to disable Defender include using the Windows Security GUI, PowerShell commands, Command Prompt, or Group Policy (available only for certain editions). Disabling Tamper Protection requires accessing the GUI or being managed by an organization. To check if Defender is disabled, users can use PowerShell to review specific fields. Common reasons for Defender reactivating include enabled Tamper Protection, system reboots, Windows Updates, lack of third-party antivirus, and security policy refreshes. Installing a legitimate third-party antivirus is often the best way to maintain a consistent state. Instead of disabling Defender, users can add exclusions for specific folders related to virtual machines or development tools, allowing them to maintain protection while avoiding conflicts. Troubleshooting common problems includes ensuring elevated sessions for PowerShell, checking Tamper Protection status, and understanding the limitations of the Group Policy editor based on the Windows edition. Disabling Defender may be appropriate in specific scenarios, but for regular use, especially on machines handling sensitive tasks, the risks generally outweigh the benefits. Using exclusions is recommended for performance improvements without compromising security.
Winsage
May 21, 2026
In April 2026, two zero-day vulnerabilities, RedSun and UnDefend, were discovered in Microsoft Defender, affecting Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server platforms. These vulnerabilities allow attackers to escalate privileges to SYSTEM and bypass Defender’s protections. RedSun exploits a flaw in Defender's remediation process, enabling low-privileged users to overwrite critical system files. UnDefend allows attackers to disrupt Defender’s updates, keeping it outdated and ineffective. Both vulnerabilities are actively being exploited, with attackers leveraging them to gain persistent access and deploy ransomware. The primary targets are organizations using Windows systems with Defender enabled, particularly in sectors like finance, healthcare, and government. Mitigation strategies include applying updates for related vulnerabilities, monitoring for suspicious activities, and implementing additional security measures.
Tech Optimizer
May 13, 2026
Every device connected to a corporate network, including laptops, desktops, servers, and mobile phones, can be a potential gateway for cyberattacks. AI-powered Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are essential in modern cybersecurity strategies, utilizing behavioral analysis, real-time monitoring, and machine learning to detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats. Traditional antivirus software, which relies on known malicious signatures, is becoming ineffective against modern attackers who use fileless attacks and custom-built malware. EDR continuously monitors endpoint activity, capturing behavioral data to identify anomalies consistent with attacks. It provides forensic capabilities to help security teams understand how breaches occur. EDR is a critical component of a multi-layered security architecture, complementing other security measures like firewalls and patch management. When choosing an EDR solution, organizations should consider real-time detection, automated response capabilities, integration with existing security tools, and ease of investigation.
Tech Optimizer
May 13, 2026
AV-Comparatives conducted the 2026 EDR Detection Validation Test, certifying nine enterprise solutions for their detection capabilities. The certified products include Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security Enterprise, ESET PROTECT Elite, Fortinet FortiEDR, G DATA 365 | MXDR, Genian Insight E, Kaspersky EDR Expert (on-premises), ManageEngine Endpoint Central with EDR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Pro, and Sangfor Athena AI-Native EPP. The evaluation focused on the effectiveness, consistency, and usability of detection capabilities, providing a clear overview of each product's performance in a realistic 14-stage Advanced Persistent Threat scenario. The assessment ensured that results were not influenced by prevention mechanisms and highlighted the role of AI in improving detection result readability and SOC efficiency.
Winsage
May 11, 2026
A security researcher has developed a proof-of-concept tool called GhostLock, which exploits a vulnerability in the Windows file API, specifically the 'CreateFileW' function. By manipulating the 'dwShareMode' parameter to grant exclusive access to files, GhostLock can prevent other users or applications from opening those files, resulting in a 'STATUSSHARINGVIOLATION' error. The tool automates the process of opening multiple files on SMB shares, causing access disruptions without requiring elevated privileges. This technique is intended as a disruption attack rather than a destructive one, similar to ransomware, and can serve as a diversion during intrusions. Detection of this attack relies on monitoring the open-file count with ShareAccess set to 0 at the file server layer. Dvash has provided resources for IT teams to enhance detection capabilities against this threat.
Winsage
May 11, 2026
Open-source endpoint detection tools have typically been divided between Windows and Linux, with Windows solutions focused on Sysmon and Linux solutions on eBPF or auditd. Rustinel is a Rust-based endpoint agent that consolidates these efforts by gathering telemetry from both operating systems using ETW on Windows and eBPF on Linux, normalizing the data into a unified model. It evaluates the information against Sigma rules, YARA signatures, and atomic indicators of compromise, storing alerts in ECS-compatible NDJSON format for integration with SIEM or log-analysis platforms. Rustinel supports a range of events on Windows, including process creation, network activity, and PowerShell executions, while Linux support currently includes process, network, file, and DNS telemetry. It operates in user mode on both platforms, requiring specific conditions for installation. Unlike commercial EDR solutions that use kernel drivers, Rustinel's user-mode design prioritizes simplicity and stability, although it acknowledges limitations in tamper resistance and visibility. The agent utilizes three detection engines: Sigma for behavioral matching, YARA for scanning executables, and an IOC engine for deterministic checks. While it leverages existing content familiar to defenders, it has coverage gaps for certain advanced threats. Rustinel is available on GitHub under the Apache 2.0 license.
Search