NewApp Digest
search bot

refund

silver Android smartphone
Tech Optimizer
September 3, 2026

Bitdefender vs Norton 2026: Which Antivirus Wins?

Norton and Bitdefender both have a malware detection rate of 99.8%. Norton excels in phishing protection, blocking 95% of phishing attempts compared to Bitdefender's 89%. In terms of system impact, Bitdefender uses 11% CPU and 183 MB RAM during scans, while Norton uses 23% CPU and 384 MB RAM. Norton offers features such as cloud backup, parental controls, and unlimited VPN, whereas Bitdefender lacks cloud backup and has a limited VPN. Pricing for both is competitive, but Bitdefender generally has cheaper renewal costs. Norton provides faster customer support response times. In a comparison of nine categories, Norton won five and Bitdefender won three. For users needing backup and parental controls, Norton is preferred; for those with older laptops, Bitdefender is recommended.
Site provides instructions to get up to $175 back for your pre-installed Windows 11 license — new portal provides legal forms, but warns buyers not to wipe storage first
Winsage
August 29, 2026

Site provides instructions to get up to $175 back for your pre-installed Windows 11 license — new portal provides legal forms, but warns buyers not to wipe storage first

A significant portion of new PCs is sold with Windows 11 pre-installed, causing frustration among Linux enthusiasts. The Refund4Freedom initiative, launched by the Italian Linux Society and the Free Software Foundation Europe, aims to provide consumers with the option to purchase laptops without being tied to a specific operating system and to avoid paying for unwanted software. The initiative has three main demands: 1. Freedom of Choice: Consumers should not be forced to use or pay for pre-installed software. 2. Transparent Pricing: Consumers should be able to purchase hardware without pre-installed software and see price differences. 3. Clear Refund Processes: Manufacturers must provide clear guidelines for requesting refunds for pre-installed software. The Refund4Freedom website details various brands' reimbursement practices, noting that Acer and Lenovo have established refund processes for Windows, while Asus has a less visible route primarily in Italy. Dell and HP currently do not offer reimbursement options. For those wishing to reject Windows, Refund4Freedom advises documenting contract clauses, contacting customer service, and using a pre-made form for refunds, which is tailored for Italy. The typical reimbursement amount for a Windows license is around €50, though it varies by region and manufacturer.
Scammers Impersonate Microsoft to Push Fake Security Scans and Refund Fraud
Tech Optimizer
August 27, 2026

Scammers Impersonate Microsoft to Push Fake Security Scans and Refund Fraud

A network of fraudulent websites, branded as SysScan, has been discovered, which falsely claims to evaluate antivirus software effectiveness through deceptive security scans. These sites manipulate users into uninstalling legitimate antivirus products and disclosing sensitive personal and banking information. Eleven distinct domains associated with SysScan have been identified, all hosted on a single server. The fraudulent scans generate misleading results based on static findings rather than actual system assessments, and users are coerced into believing their computers are at risk. The scams misrepresent normal browser behaviors as security threats and instruct victims to uninstall their antivirus software, compromising their defenses. The operation targets both individual and business users, collecting extensive personal information and utilizing remote-access tools. The data submitted is sent to Telegram via its bot API. Users are advised to disconnect from the internet and secure their devices if they suspect they have been compromised. Indicators of compromise include specific IP addresses and domains associated with the scam.
U.S. court fines Google $700 million over Android app monopoly
AppWizard
August 20, 2026

U.S. court fines Google $700 million over Android app monopoly

The U.S. District Court in California fined Google [openai_gpt model="gpt-4o-mini" prompt="Summarize the content and extract only the fact described in the text bellow. The summary shall NOT include a title, introduction and conclusion. Text: The U.S. District Court in California has imposed a hefty fine of 0 million on Google, citing its monopolistic practices in the distribution of Android apps and in-app payment processing via the Google Play Store. This ruling follows a comprehensive multistate lawsuit initiated by 53 attorneys general from various states, culminating after nearly five years of legal proceedings. The plaintiffs contended that Google engaged in practices that stifled competition by limiting access to alternative app stores, discouraging developers from creating competing applications, and complicating the process for users wishing to download apps outside of the Google Play Store. Consumer Refunds and Accountability Washington Attorney General Nick Brown announced that approximately million of the settlement will be allocated to refund consumers in the state, with an estimated 2.4 million individuals eligible for reimbursement. “Most of the settlement funds will go directly to people who made purchases on Google Play between August 2016 and September 2023. Most recipients won’t need to fill out a claim form and will receive their payments through PayPal or Venmo,” he explained. Mr. Brown emphasized the importance of his office's role in safeguarding residents from monopolistic practices. “When giant companies gain an illegal stranglehold on a market, we take action and deliver relief for consumers,” he stated. “Fighting monopolies is one of our office’s core responsibilities, and I’m proud that millions of Washingtonians will now get refunds because of our litigation.” Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes also weighed in on the matter, criticizing Google for leveraging its dominant position in the app market to inflate prices. “With this settlement, we’re saying loud and clear that anticompetitive conduct like this will not be tolerated,” she asserted. “A competitive, fair marketplace promotes lower prices, higher quality goods and services, and more options for consumers. My office will continue to go after illegal and unfair business practices to protect Arizonans.”" max_tokens="3500" temperature="0.3" top_p="1.0" best_of="1" presence_penalty="0.1" frequency_penalty="frequency_penalty"] million for monopolistic practices related to Android app distribution and in-app payment processing via the Google Play Store, following a multistate lawsuit by 53 attorneys general. Approximately million of the settlement will be used to refund around 2.4 million consumers in Washington who made purchases on Google Play between August 2016 and September 2023, with payments distributed through PayPal or Venmo. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown highlighted the importance of addressing monopolistic practices, while Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes criticized Google's pricing strategies and affirmed the commitment to combat anticompetitive conduct.
Search