Samsung and Google continue to dominate the North American Android landscape, captivating media and consumer attention alike. Their offerings are often lauded for superior software update support and a plethora of exclusive hardware and software features. However, there are notable functionalities that both brands have yet to adopt or fully realize, which could enhance the user experience across their devices.
Ultra-fast charging technology
While fast charging has become a standard expectation, the definition of “fast” varies significantly across brands. In the U.S., Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra boasts a maximum charging speed of 60W, while the Pixel 11 Pro family reaches up to 45W. These advancements, albeit improvements from previous generations, still lag behind global competitors. For instance, the OnePlus 15, though now discontinued, offered an impressive 80W charging capability, achieving a full charge in about 40 minutes. Internationally, brands like HUAWEI and Xiaomi have pushed the envelope even further, with devices capable of 120W charging or more. This technology, while less prevalent in the U.S. due to proprietary standards and potential battery stress, is becoming increasingly efficient and could redefine user expectations for charging times.
Good old-fashioned IR blasters
For those who fondly remember the early Android days, IR blasters were once a common feature, providing a convenient solution for controlling various home electronics. In 2026, however, these devices have become a rarity, primarily found in imports or lower-end models. The OnePlus 15 stands out as an exception in the flagship category, while European markets still see options like the Xiaomi 17. Despite the prevalence of smart devices, IR blasters remain useful for controlling older TVs, sound systems, and even air conditioning units, making them a nostalgic yet practical feature worth reviving.
Xiaomi Second Space and other UI and app clones
Many Android applications are designed for single-user access, necessitating logouts for those with multiple accounts. While Samsung offers a form of app cloning through its Secure Folder and Dual Messenger modes, the implementation is limited. Xiaomi’s Second Space, on the other hand, creates an entirely separate user profile at the OS level, complete with its own security measures and customizable interface. This feature not only allows for seamless app communication but also ensures that notifications remain hidden from the primary profile, providing a more robust solution for users seeking privacy and organization.
Moto Actions
Gesture-based controls have been around for some time, yet Motorola’s Moto Actions elevate this concept by utilizing hardware sensors to recognize intricate movements. This allows users to perform actions such as launching the camera with a wrist twist or activating the flashlight with a quick chop. Unlike the typical software-based methods employed by Pixel and Galaxy devices, Moto Actions offers a level of convenience that can be executed without waking the display, making it particularly useful in everyday scenarios.
Nothing Glyph
In a recent attempt to enhance notifications, Google introduced the HiLight LED indicator, which has received lukewarm responses for its limited functionality. In contrast, the Nothing Phone’s Glyph system provides a more comprehensive approach, utilizing a circular dot-matrix display to convey app-specific alerts and contact notifications. This system not only reduces screen time but also includes fun features like Glyph Toys, which offer interactive tools and games. The thoughtful design of the Glyph system stands in stark contrast to Google’s current notification offerings, showcasing the potential for innovation in user engagement.
These five features exemplify the opportunities for Samsung and Google to expand their offerings and enhance user experiences. As the competition in the Android space continues to evolve, the integration of such functionalities could prove beneficial for both brands and their loyal customer bases.
