When Microsoft made the Windows as a Service pivot

Former Microsoft engineer Dave Plummer recently shared insights on the company’s strategic shift from paid upgrades to a Windows as a Service model. Reflecting on his tenure, Plummer, who played a pivotal role in developing Task Manager, noted that the transition was not merely a business decision but a response to an evolving technological landscape.

Windows Evolution and Market Pressures

Plummer reminisced about the success of Windows 7, which launched in 2009 and remains a beloved version among users. In contrast, he described Windows 8, released in 2012, as “a bit of a different story,” highlighting the challenges Microsoft faced shortly after Windows 7’s triumph. The introduction of free operating system upgrades by competitors like Apple and the emergence of user-friendly Linux distributions intensified the pressure on Microsoft.

“The company faced multiple challenges,” Plummer recalled, citing an aging Windows 7, the disappointing reception of Windows 8, and declining PC sales. This environment set the stage for a significant pivot, coinciding with Satya Nadella’s ascension as CEO, which marked a shift from a Windows-first approach to a broader focus on cloud services and customer engagement.

A Radical Shift in Strategy

As part of this new direction, Microsoft made Windows 10 available as a free upgrade for users of Windows 7, 8, and 8.1. This strategy was framed internally as a move to a Windows as a Service model, moving away from the traditional one-time purchase model. Plummer explained that instead of charging upwards of 0 for an upgrade, the company opted for a free transition, utilizing various methods to encourage users to upgrade.

While this approach meant forgoing immediate revenue from operating system sales, it proved to be a resounding success. It not only ensured that users remained updated but also introduced them to Microsoft’s subscription services, such as OneDrive and Skype. Furthermore, the large user base of Windows 10 allowed Microsoft to gather valuable telemetry data, enhancing the overall user experience.

The Double-Edged Sword of Telemetry

However, the extensive telemetry built into Windows 10 raised concerns among some users. Plummer acknowledged that while the data collection aimed to improve the operating system, it also sparked unease regarding privacy. The adage “If you’re not paying for the product, you probably are the product” resonated strongly in this context, as users noticed built-in advertising and upsell mechanisms within the OS.

Despite the absence of a direct charge for Windows 10, Microsoft subtly guided users toward its paid services. Plummer noted this marked a significant departure from previous versions of Windows, which had not included advertising. The transition to a service model not only smoothed revenue fluctuations for Microsoft but also addressed the piracy issue by offering free upgrades even to users with non-genuine copies of Windows.

Reflections on the Current Landscape

While Windows 10 was undoubtedly a success, Plummer expressed his discontent with certain aspects of the current model. He emphasized a desire for a version of Windows Pro that excludes telemetry and advertising, suggesting he would willingly pay a monthly fee for such a product. He also proposed that users purchasing devices should have the option to select a version free from ads and excessive data collection.

Plummer’s experience with multiple operating systems has led him to perceive Windows as a tool that sometimes feels more like an adversary, monetizing user interactions too frequently for his liking. As the landscape of operating systems continues to evolve, the balance between user experience, privacy, and business strategy remains a critical conversation in the tech industry.

Winsage
When Microsoft made the Windows as a Service pivot