Steam Controller review: Somehow both the most and least versatile PC controller

As the Steam Controller continues to capture attention, it has become a hot commodity, with scalpers inflating prices to nearly three times the original cost. Valve has assured eager gamers that additional stock is on the way, highlighting the significant demand for this unique peripheral. However, the question remains: does this demand reflect a genuine need, or is it merely a trend? The answer largely hinges on individual expectations and gaming habits.

Comfort and Customization

At first glance, the Steam Controller’s size might suggest discomfort, yet Valve has skillfully designed it for an ergonomic experience. The layout allows most players to comfortably position their thumbs on the sticks and fingers on the triggers. While those accustomed to the Xbox controller layout may initially feel disoriented by the Steam Controller’s design, the learning curve is minimal—most users adapt within minutes.

In addition to the standard buttons found on contemporary controllers, the Steam Controller boasts four customizable buttons located beneath the grips, along with two touchpad-like panels. These trackpads function similarly to those on the Steam Deck, allowing users to control the mouse cursor in games that require it, such as Football Manager, or to navigate the camera in compatible titles. Enhanced with haptic feedback, these pads provide a tactile sensation that adds to the overall experience.

The inclusion of gyro controls further expands the controller’s versatility, enabling players to map these features to various functions, including mouse movement and aiming. Customization is a key selling point, allowing users to tailor their gaming experience extensively. For instance, players can assign keyboard shortcuts to the left trackpad, transforming it into a radial menu for quick access to commands.

Limitations and Compatibility

However, the Steam Controller is primarily designed for those who enjoy tinkering with their setup. Gamers who prefer a straightforward experience with a plug-and-play controller, such as the Xbox Wireless Controller or DualSense, may find the Steam Controller’s extensive customization options unnecessary. It’s essential to note that the Steam Controller operates using Steam Input rather than the standard XInput protocol, which means it may not function seamlessly with non-Steam applications.

For instance, when attempting to launch Forza Horizon 5 via the Xbox app, users may encounter difficulties with basic controls, as the Steam Controller does not register as a traditional controller. This limitation can be frustrating for those who enjoy a variety of gaming platforms beyond Steam. Although some workarounds exist, such as adding non-Steam games to the Steam library, success is not guaranteed, and the experience can vary significantly from one game to another.

Final Thoughts on the Steam Controller

The absence of a 3.5mm headphone port may also be a consideration for some users. While this may not affect those who have their headset connected directly to their PC, it could pose a challenge for gamers who prefer to use their controller for audio output, particularly when playing on a TV through Steam Big Picture mode.

Ultimately, the Steam Controller’s appeal lies in its ability to cater to a specific audience. For dedicated Steam users seeking a highly customizable controller, it stands out as a top choice. Conversely, for gamers who frequently engage with other platforms or prefer a more traditional gaming experience, the Steam Controller may not be the ideal fit. Its design and functionality, while impressive, do not fundamentally change the controller landscape, making it a valuable tool for some but not necessarily a game-changer for all.

AppWizard
Steam Controller review: Somehow both the most and least versatile PC controller