As Microsoft prepares to sunset Windows 10 in October 2025, users are faced with the pressing question of how to transition from an operating system that has become increasingly vulnerable to security threats. The absence of updates post-October 2025 could leave users exposed, making it essential to explore alternatives sooner rather than later.
While upgrading to Windows 11 might be an option for some, it’s crucial to first assess whether your hardware meets the necessary requirements. For those contemplating a more robust and secure solution, Linux and MacOS emerge as compelling contenders. Here are several factors to consider when making this decision.
1. Cost
When it comes to cost, MacOS presents a unique challenge. Although the operating system itself is free, the hardware required to run it is not. For instance, the entry-level iMac M4 starts at ,299, while the MacBook Air begins at ,099. These prices reflect the premium nature of Apple products.
In contrast, Linux offers a cost-effective solution. Users can download a single ISO file to install Linux on multiple machines without incurring any costs. For those on a budget, Linux is an attractive option, whereas MacOS is better suited for those who can afford the investment in Apple hardware.
2. Hardware choice
MacOS limits users to three hardware options: the iMac, Mac Mini, or MacBook. Linux, however, opens the door to a vast array of choices. Users can opt for computers pre-installed with Linux from manufacturers like System76 or Tuxedo Computers, install Linux on their existing Windows machines, or purchase a compatible device from a variety of retailers.
Moreover, Linux users enjoy the flexibility to upgrade components such as RAM, GPUs, and CPUs, enhancing their systems as needed. For those who value choice and customization, Linux stands out, while MacOS caters to those who prefer the streamlined experience of Apple hardware.
3. Flexibility
MacOS is renowned for its user-friendliness and stability, but this comes at the cost of customization. While users can make minor tweaks, the operating system remains relatively rigid. For those who prioritize ease of use, MacOS is a solid choice.
Conversely, Linux offers a highly customizable environment. Users can choose from various desktop environments, such as GNOME or KDE Plasma, tailoring their experience to their preferences. For those who enjoy personalizing their operating system, Linux provides endless possibilities.
4. Proprietary vs. open-source
The distinction between proprietary and open-source software may not resonate with everyone, but it carries significant implications. Open-source software typically benefits from rapid patching in response to vulnerabilities, often within hours. In contrast, closed-source systems like Windows and MacOS may experience delays in addressing security issues.
If swift vulnerability management is a priority, Linux is the clear winner. However, for users who are less concerned about the speed of updates, MacOS remains a viable option.
5. Reliability
Both Linux and MacOS are known for their reliability, far surpassing that of Windows 10. Users can expect fewer issues with system crashes and have access to tools for troubleshooting should problems arise. My personal experience suggests that Linux tends to be even more reliable than MacOS, making it a strong candidate for those seeking stability.
As the end of life for Windows 10 approaches, users should carefully evaluate their options. Both Linux and MacOS offer robust alternatives, each with unique advantages that cater to different needs and preferences. Exploring these operating systems could lead to a more secure and efficient computing experience.
