In the ever-evolving landscape of operating systems, the question arises: does Google truly need a remix of its Android platform to further its ambitions in the PC market? With Windows commanding approximately 72% of desktop OS share and macOS holding around 16%, according to StatCounter, the challenge for Google is evident. ChromeOS lingers in the low single digits, while Android boasts over 3 billion active devices globally—a reach unmatched by any other client OS. If Google seeks to capture a larger slice of the PC market, leveraging its existing platform may be the most expedient route.
What Aluminium signals about Google’s desktop ambitions
Aluminium, a new initiative from Google, appears to draw inspiration from Android’s legacy while targeting laptops and desktops. This suggests a focus on ARM architecture and a commitment to enhancing multitasking capabilities, keyboard-and-mouse input, and comprehensive file management. Google seems intent on crafting a cohesive user experience rather than merely adapting ChromeOS to fit a broader scope.
However, the introduction of a new branch carries the risk of fragmentation. Diverting developers’ attention could lead to redundant efforts. A more robust approach might involve strengthening the existing desktop components within Android and establishing high standards for applications designed for larger screens.
Could Android realistically substitute as a full PC OS?
Android’s evolution has transcended its origins as a mobile-first operating system. With updates like Android 12L, enhancements for large-screen usage have emerged, including improved taskbars, keyboard shortcuts, and support for freeform windows. The Undercover Desktop Mode allows applications to run in stable, resizable windows on contemporary hardware.
Real-world implementations, such as Samsung DeX and Motorola Ready For, demonstrate that stock Android can indeed be adapted for a desktop experience, offering multi-window support and compatibility with peripherals and external displays. Google’s Play Games on PC further illustrates this potential, providing seamless keyboard mapping and window management across numerous titles without necessitating a complete OS overhaul.
App ecosystem and productivity gaps that still matter
Despite these advancements, challenges remain, particularly concerning large-screen usability and software quality. Many Android applications are still designed for touch interfaces, lacking adequate keyboard shortcuts and not scaling well on larger displays. Addressing these issues may require policy changes rather than a complete kernel redesign; for instance, implementing a “PC-ready” classification in Google Play could enforce necessary standards for input, windowing, and responsiveness.
Productivity tools are improving, with Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Slack, and Zoom functioning effectively as native apps or installable PWAs in Chrome. Creative applications like Adobe Lightroom and CapCut are well-represented, yet high-end desktop versions of software such as Photoshop remain elusive. Introducing a lightweight Linux container for Android, akin to Crostini on ChromeOS, could provide power users with the tools they need without compromising security.
Hardware and performance considerations for Android PCs
On the performance front, Android is well-positioned. The advancement of ARM laptop silicon, particularly Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon X-class chips, promises robust multi-core performance and powerful NPUs for on-device AI. Android’s compatibility with ARM architecture and modern graphics APIs like Vulkan further enhances its viability for laptops.
However, challenges related to drivers and input/output remain. Enhancements in multi-monitor scaling, low-latency input, and support for printers and scanners via the Android Printing Framework are essential. These improvements do not necessitate a new OS but rather require strategic partnerships, certification processes, and a clear definition of “Android PC” device compatibility.
Security and enterprise readiness updates for Android PCs
Android’s security framework is more robust than many realize, featuring Verified Boot, Play Protect, and enterprise-grade device management through Android Enterprise. Google and Linaro’s decision to extend the Android Common Kernel’s support window to six years, alongside Project Mainline’s modular updates, strengthens its appeal for enterprise use.
To attract fleet buyers, Google must establish a clear support policy for PC-class devices, ideally offering 6 to 8 years of OS and security updates, along with multi-user and domain-style management. These are not insurmountable barriers but rather strategic considerations that require careful planning.
The playbook to make Android truly PC-ready right now
- Develop a refined default Desktop Mode that includes features like window snapping, a Mission Control-style overview, multi-monitor support, and universal keyboard shortcuts.
- Implement stringent UX guidelines, mandate mouse and keyboard support, and create a ‘Designed for Android PC’ program in Google Play, incentivizing developers to comply.
- Establish a native Linux workspace for developers, complete with GPU support and low-latency input for IDEs.
- Enhance desktop-class file access through a straightforward Storage Access Framework, ensuring enterprise policy controls are in place.
- Integrate professional-grade audio communications features, including noise cancellation and low-latency processing, validated with leading peripherals.
- Collaborate with top OEMs to produce thin-and-light laptops and 2-in-1s powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon processors, ensuring compatibility with Android apps and Microsoft productivity tools.
Verdict: Android can become a first-class PC OS with focus
Google’s aspirations for the PC market do not necessitate a complete reinvention of Android. With disciplined product development—focusing on desktop refinement, app quality, enterprise strategies, and OEM collaboration—Android has the potential to emerge as a first-class PC operating system. If Aluminium is to materialize, the key lies not in a fork but in a dedicated, PC-grade evolution of the Android platform that users are already familiar with.
